Keywords
evaluation of educational process
CMKP
Poland
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction. Training of health professionals on the Eleventh Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) is essential for the health system. Consequently, the various elements of this training, including workshops and training courses, should be monitored on an ongoing basis, and the views of participants in these forms of training are useful in this regard.
Objective of the paper. The aim of the study was to find out the opinions of the participants of the ICD-11 training courses and workshops conducted by the School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education (CMKP) on the forms of training provided in 2023 and their usefulness, as well as on future training needs.
Material and methods. The material for the analysis consisted of 234 online questionnaires (including 52 questionnaires from online workshop and 182 from online training) and 129 evaluation questionnaires (including 88 questionnaires from online workshop and 41 from online training) obtained from the participants of the workshops and training courses conducted in 2023.
Results. Workshops and training courses on ICD-11 were assessed as improving knowledge of the ICD-11 classification, which will be introduced in Poland in the future. Participants expressed interest in attending further workshops and training course and indicated the specific topics they would be most interested in.
Conclusions. The results indicate the relevance of the chosen forms of workshop and training courses organisation. The survey of participants' opinions is an important tool for improving the quality of the educational process.
References
(1) Website of Ministry of Health. https://zdrowie.gov.pl/power/strona-1051poprawa_jakosci_informacji_medycznej.html.
(2) Website of CMKP. https://www.cmkp.edu.pl/icd-11.
(3) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational. Standards for Evaluations of Educational Programs, Projects and Materials. New York 1981, McGraw-Hill:12.
(4) Pacławska K. Ewaluacja w dydaktyce akademickiej. [In:] Skulicz D, editor. W poszukiwaniu modelu dydaktyki akademickiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Kraków 2004; 121-134.
(5) Brzezińska A, Miejsce ewaluacji w procesie kształcenia [w:] A. Brzezińska, J. Brzeziński [red.], Ewaluacja procesu kształcenia w szkole wyższej, Poznań 2000. Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.
(6) https://www.ehea.info/page-ministerial-conference-bologna-1999.
(7) Zgliczyński WS. Polityka edukacyjna Unii Europejskiej. Studia BAS 2010; 2:65-88.
(8) Opolski J, Zgliczyński WS, Ruiz M, Węgrzyn Z, Żochowski A. Jednolity, obowiązkowy dla wszystkich lekarzy kurs specjalizacyjny w dziedzinie zdrowia publicznego – w ocenie słuchaczy Szkoły Zdrowia Publicznego CMKP. Postępy Nauk Medycznych 2009; 4:277-281.
(9) Cianciara D, Zgliczyński WS, Piętka S, Bereza T. Compulsory public health courses for physicians – assessment of courses by attendees in the School of Public Health in Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education. Postępy Nauk Medycznych 2016; 5:292-297. DOI:10.5604/08606196.1202372.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.